Andrew Rogers contributes to USA Today, Gol TV and Four Four Two. He lives in Sunbury on Thames in England. Formerly the director of communications for the Long Island (N.Y.) Rough Riders, he is a UEFA 'B" license coach and
plays semi-professionally with Spelthorne FC.
He can be reached at andrewrogers@optonline.net

The best and not so good of 2006

World Cup 2006: USA vs. Czech Republic

After all the hype, conjecture and analysis, the United States World Cup bubble was well and truly burst after 5 minutes of the campaign. Zdenek Grygera stole down the right flank, delivering a pinpoint cross to Jan Koeller, who rammed home a barn storming header from four yards leaving Americans Eddie Pope and Oguchi Onyewu wondering what day of the week it was. We tend to forget on 28 minutes, U.S. midfielder Claudio Reyna saw his shot from 25 yards bounce back off the inside of the post. That would have made it 1-1.

World Cup 2006 USA vs. Italy

The Battle for K-Town has to go down as one of the most exhilarating games in World Cup history. With its back to the wall and down to nine men, the U.S. held out against the eventual world champion with a one-man disadvantage. Again the marking was woeful when Italy gained the lead. However, the Americans showed their mettle in leveling the game, and was I alone in thinking DaMarcus Beasley had put the U.S. men in front before McBride was ruled offside?

Sheanon Williams' bicycle kick for U.S. under-17 men

Left- or right-sided defenders are usually percentage players. They rarely do much wrong, but then again they rarely do much right. However, right back Sheanon Williams did something very right in London early this year, scoring one of the best goals ever witnessed at any level of the game. In an under-17 men's match, Turkey had played the U.S off the field for much of the first half, but was left stunned in the second period when Williams controlled the ball on his chest on the edge of the Turkish area and, in the same motion, bicycle-kicked into the top left corner. Sub goalkeeper Erdem Kose could only watch in amazement as the ball rocketed past him. A truly exquisite moment in football.

Colorado Rapids defeats FC Dallas in penalties

FC Dallas has made the Major League Soccer playoffs in nine of 11 seasons, but what does this team have to do to make the MLS Cup final? Comfortably, the best team in the Western Conference in the regular season, and with Kenny Cooper and Carlos Ruiz sweeping aside all before them the title was on the cards, Dallas overcame a Clint Mathis rocket with six minutes remaining in overtime. Dallas keeper Dario Sala denied Aitor Karanka to keep the penalty-kicks tiebreaker alive, only to then miss his own penalty in a 5-4 loss in the extra session, maintaining Dallas fans' state of perpetual misery.

Ashley Cole transfers to Chelsea for $10 million, plus William Gallas

When Arsenal made a final offer to the former Highbury fullback of a near-$110,000-per-week contract, Ashely Cole said in his book "My Defence" that he felt "insulted" and "betrayed" by the Arsenal board's offer. Now while most people wouldn't mind being disrespected in such a manner, Cole did have a very good point within the context of the football world. He might not be an Alan Iverson or Terrell Owens, but at least European soccer is moving in the right direction when it comes to producing outsized egos.

Jay DeMerit vs. Leeds United in promotion final

Has there been another soccer story like it? Barely recognized for his soccer ability at college or in the professional league in the U.S., the Industrial Design Major jumps on a plane to England and, managing on £40 per week, pursues his dream of becoming a pro soccer player. The defender recalls: "U.S. soccer wasn't prepared to take a chance on me, so I took a chance on myself."

Powering his way through the Leeds defense to put Watford 1-0 up, the goal epitomized the timing, poise and determination of the Green Bay, Wisc., native. Three years ago he was serving in bars. Now he's tending to the world's best strikers.

Martin Jol vs. Arsenal in North London Derby

After the last North Londin Derby at Arsenal's Highbury, Tottenham Hotspur manager Martin Jol, when asked if his midfielder Edgar Davids should have played on when Arsenal had two players down injured, he claimed, "I didn't see the incident." OK, fair enough Mr. Jol. Let's ignore the fact that you were standing 10 yards away from the play. Ultimately, there was a certain amount of poetic justice in the manner the Spurs manager defended his player. For years, Wenger has allowed his players to behave like utter thugs only to suggest he "didn't see the incident." Jol's timing in delivering Wenger some just desserts was priceless.

Marcus Hahnemann: A year to remember

Back in 2003, American goalkeeper Marcus Hahnemann was under real pressure. He was out of contract at Fulham and the ITV digital deal had collapsed, leaving clubs with no money for transfers. To make matters worse, MLS wasn't interested with the end of the season approaching. The big man from Seattle could have ended up at Walsall in the fourth division but, luckily for Hahnemann. director of football at Reading FC, Nicky Hammonds remembered him from a recent trial and secured his services. Step forward to 2006 and Hahnemann had been recalled to the U.S. men, had one of the best defensive records in Europe in Reading's promotion campaign, and has six clean sheets already this year in the English Premier League. And to think the Royals were favorites for the drop back to the League Championship this year.

Steven Gerrard vs. West Ham United in FA Cup final

With seconds remaining in sports' oldest knockout competition, West Ham right back Lionel Scaloni fatally failed to clear a dodgy Dietmar Hamann throw-in, having cleared the ball so Djibril Cissé could be treated for a cramp. Eventually, the ball fell to Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard who, injured in both legs and staggering through the last 10 minutes of the game, mustered one last effort to smash home a 35-yard pile-driver from downtown Cardiff. Hollywood couldn't have created a more dramatic finale.

Zinedine Zidane's head-butt in World Cup final

Having failed miserably in the 2002 World Cup in South Korea and Japan, France midfielder Zinedine Zidame practically wrote his own script in Germany 2006. Against Brazil, he showed the likes of Ronaldinho and Kaka who the real boss was and then dispatched Portugal's "golden generation" with a first-half penalty kick. The stage was set for "Zizou" in Berlin. With the game heading to PKs, France knew Italy had no nerve for the dreaded shootout. What the French did not count on was Zidane taking exception to the comments of a journeyman pro in the shape of Marco Materazzi. Having won everything football had to offer. Zidame could afford to put his pride ahead of his team, but duly head-butted the perpetrator of a family slur. Interestingly, Zidame was sent off on the evidence of the fourth official who had seen a TV replay, which was an illegal procedure. However, Zindane was able to leave the game stating in actions rather than words to two billion viewers that his family honor comes before anything else.

Team of 2006 (national team and club in parentheses).

Goalkeeper: Petr Cech (Czech Republic, Chelsea).
Defenders: Fabio Grosso (Italy, Inter Milan), John Terry (England, Chelsea), Fabio Cannavaro (Italy, Real Madrid), Ashley Cole (England, Arsenal).
Midfielders: Clint Dempsey (United States, New England Revolution, now transferred to Fulham), Andrea Pirlo (Italy, AC Milan), Zinedine Zidane (France, Real Madrid, now retired).
Forwards: Arjen Robben (Netherlands, Chelsea), Didier Drogba (Cote d'Ivoire, Chelsea), Cristiano Ronaldo (Portugal, Manchester United).

Top of Page

English teams trying to regain greatness

SUNBURY ON THAMES, England (Wednesday, September 13, 2006) -- In the modern era of soccer, the term "great" has not always been strictly appropriate when describing the English Premier League. The level of entertainment is undisputed, but the same cannot not be said for the league's skill and tactical acumen.

Rightly, the league and its clubs are proud of the brand and commercial growth since its inception, but as the European Champions League -- initiated at the same time as the EPL - starts up this week, a cursory glance over the stats, highlights the failure of English clubs in the true acid test for greatness -- conquering Europe.

During the '70s and '80s, English club's dominated the scene and could rightly claim to have the greatest league. Between 1976 and 1984, they won the European Cup in seven out of eight attempts. Smaller clubs, such as Nottingham Forest and Aston Villa, highlighted the league's depth by claiming the top prize.

Additionally, the likes of Tottenham, Everton and Ipswich were all-conquering in the UEFA Cup. Unfortunately, a small but significant section of "supporters" replicated the teams' dominance on the pitch through violence on the terraces, culminating in the Heysel Tragedy.

UEFA sanctions against English clubs' resulted in a five-year ban. Subsequently, Spain and Italy went on to produce 10 of the next 20 European Cup winners.

Italian clubs competed in nine of the European Cup finals between 1988-98 and, of equal significance, during the '80s and '90s, on four occasions both representatives in the UEFA Cup final were from Serie "A." The tournament was once regarded as the toughest European trophy to win.

English clubs could no longer claim to be the greatest and the attempts of Leeds, Arsenal and Blackburn were at times as ignorant and myopic as the "fans" that got them kicked out in the first place. There were many "reasons" for the failures, such as the three-foreigner rule and a lack of experience. But the simple fact was English clubs lacked the necessary skill and tactics to overcome opposition they considered to be not as prestigious or worthy.

Arguably,. the turning point for English football occurred when Manchester United beat SK Rapid Wien at the Prater Stadium. Needing a win to qualify for the knockout stages in the 1996-97 season, the Red Devils were able to retain possession when it mattered and absorb periods of sustained pressure. The team was predominantly British. but the key players' were foreign.

United and Liverpool have picked up the title since England's return, but it took them nearly 10 years to get there, and the fear and respect that once marked their football were long gone. Furthermore, the teams are now more likely to consist of players from outside of England.

English successes has coincided with a reduction in homegrown players' being in the side and greater exposure to continental opposition.

It is now apparent with Arsenal and Middlesbrough reaching the respective finals last year that England at club level is once again capable of dominating. Albeit, Arsenal only played two English men and the majority of Middlesbrough's side was born outside of the British Isles.

This trend might suggest English players are not up to the job -- this has been previously discussed in the column. However, more importantly, it is a huge opportunity to translate the leagues economic and moral advantages into success.

As well as producing sides that can make finals, the league is also home to the majority of the world's best players. Whereas in the past they would head to Italy, Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich's financial muscle has attracted the likes of Michael Ballack and Andriy Shevchenko, players that simply would not have come to England before his arrival.

The experience, skill and tactical ability are now all in place and reason would suggest English clubs' might hold hegemony in Europe once again, but unfortunately when did reason ever come into football?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Americans on display
The weekend's Premier League fixtures proved to be a strong for United States soccer. Everton goalkeeper Tim Howard shut out Liverpool to win the Merseyside derby, the U.S. combo of Brian McBride and Carlos Bocanegra KOed Newcastle and, on paper, four players could have turned out in the Reading-vs.-Manchester City fixture, though DaMarcus Beasley, a player in the spotlight, was out for City because of a hamstring injury.

As matters stand, the American players are held in high esteem. Fortunately, they have been given time and naturally they have gone on to prove themselves.

Sadly, in the case of Beasley, reports came out before his arrival questioning his ability to get on with management and aspects of his personal life. Sources close the winger suggest he was dismayed to be unsettled in such a manner (transferred from PSV Eindhoven of the Netherlands) and is now intent on letting his soccer do the talking. Wise move.

However, this is a loss to the fans and writers' at this time. Suggestions that Beasley is anything but an excellent pro appear to revolve around the World Cup. As was explained to me by a very prominent member inside the squad, there are four types U.S. of player in the national team -- the Major League Soccer player with World Cup experience, the MLS player with out it, the European-based player with Cup experience and the European-based player without it. This was a new problem for the squad, but hardly significant.

What really counted against the U.S. was the fact that they were playing in ideal conditions for the top teams unlike in 2002. More importantly, though hardly recognized, the Americans' best efforts weren't quite good enough.

In the Premiership there is apathy toward the media among many players and this is not without valid reason. To create similar situation with the U.S. players would be a beyond careless. U.S. soccer presents a unique opportunity to be different and do things right, to undermine players before they make their big-time move, prompting me to believe it's the work of a desperate baseball fans.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho for USA?
The great and special one has stated he would not be leaving Chelsea if he won the Champions League, make of this what you will. The fact remains England does not have the scope or understanding to satisfying Jose's ego and vision.

The English don't appreciate his character or personality and have a strange post-modern ironic disdain for winners. One nation alone is home to the champ and understands how to make winners' feel comfortable and at ease with their success -- the USA.

If Jose Mourinho was allowed to do things his way and was given a MLS franchise called Jose United as a sideline, there would not be a limit to where he could take the men's national team. Maybe Bill Clinton could help woo him. Doesn't he owe U.S. soccer a favor?

Top of Page

U.S. U17s Deserved A Victory

The US MNT U-17 recently snatched a draw from the jaws of victory in a dominant 1-1 display against a much vaunted Portuguese side in the opening round of the Pepsi Invitational Tournament in London- England.

Coming off the back of a successful tour of the Far East where they laid to rest the ghosts of losing to the Czech Republic in Ballymena, John Hackworth’s young charges were looking to go one step further and dominant as one of the top youth sides in the world.

Their performance at Yeading’s Warren Stadium went a long way to validate this notion, but a lack of concentration deep into injury time scuppered what would have been a well deserved victory.

The opening 10 minutes produced little in the way of chances, but it was very clear from the outset that the USA were brilliantly organized.

Their movement on and off the ball kept Portugal on the back foot, and their ability to play the ball off both feet was evident across the field.

As previously discussed in this column, the U.S. now need players that can go beyond defenders with foot skills. Bryan Dominguez, Axel Levry, Jared Jeffery and Sheanon Williams were all exemplary in this respect.

Portugal simply could not deal with the U.S. tempo and defensive organisation, the pressure finally told in the 16th minute.

Daniel Wenzel who looked a class apart the entire game played a glorious 40- yard pass to the feet of Daniel Barerra.

The winger cut across the field and crossed to the back post, Ellis McLoughlin couldn’t connect, but Levry controlled well under pressure and drove the ball in off the cross bar from seven yards for a well deserved U.S. goal.

Moments later, the States opened up Portugal again. Danny Barerra, with a free kick 35 yards from goal, found McLoughlin in the box. He turned well, but blasted over from eight yards with the goal at his mercy.

On 21 minutes Portugal fashioned their first chance of the game. Dinis, and Rui Almeida combined to send through Brandao but he failed to threaten the American goal.

The U.S. response was immediate and Levry interchanged with McLoughlin to set up the lively Dominguez, he shot first time from 20 yards on his weaker left foot. The chance went high and wide, but it was the correct option.

Portugal were now being completely outgunned. On 27 minutes, Dominguez showed great feet to set up McLoughlin.

The prolific striker moved well to open up the space but was again found wanting with the finish. Like all good strikers he creates chances with ease and is never afraid to step up.

As the half closed out Dominguez again missed the target, the U.S. went in the dressing room 1-0 up, but it should have been three or four.

The second half proved to be a much more placid affair. Portugal having reportedly given debuts to 8 new players managed to get a foot hold in the game and took much of the energy and pace out of the USA.

The U.S. handed over the initiative and nearly allowed Portugal to draw level on 51 minutes.

Daniel Coelho miscued his cross into the box from the left hand side of the field. Josh Lambo appeared to be confused by the fact that it was such a bad ball and allowed it to hit the cross bar, fortunately for him Portugal could not finish the rebound.

In the 64th minute, Jared Jeffrey who impressed throughout the match, went close from a inswinging Barerra cross. Jeffrey did well to beat his marker, but could not direct his header past Ruca.

Barrera than produced the best piece of skill of the game. Receiving a ball over the top on the Portuguese goal line, he juggled the ball over Coelho’s head with is left foot and in the same motion volleyed with his right from an acute angle.

With a little more composure he would have produced one of the goals of the tournament but instead shot inches over.

In the 66th minute, Portuguese captain Dinis shot over from inside the box. It was a clear indication that the U.S. had not or could maintain the tempo of their game that had made Portugal look so ordinary in the first half.

Portugal sensed that the US had taken the foot off the gas and would have scored 7 minute later but for an excellent save from Lambo.

Tiago Torres sent in a deep cross from the right hand side. Pedro Goncalves found himself unmarked in the US box and fired low into the left hand corner.

Lambo reacted brilliantly from point blank range to push the strike round the left hand post and keep the score 1-0

With the clock counting down and the game seemly over. Referee Hill awarded Portugal a dubious free kick 40 yards from goal. The delivery found Dinis who fired unopposed into the left hand corner.

The U.S. were deservedly punished for sitting back in the second half and not taking their chances. The U.S. with the last kick of the game almost trumped the injury time equalizer.

Matthew Uy’s cross was parried to the speedy Brandon King. The winger with the chance of snatching the glory unfortunately shot high from 8 yards with the net beckoning.

Watched by England legend’s Trevor Brooking and Chris Woods, America’s young stars impressed with their skill and work rate, but will be frustrated at not proving to the world that they were better than Portugal.

“This game is cruel if you don’t take your opportunities,” said Hackworth after the final whistle. “We had too many opportunities in the first half. It was the same in the second half but we took our foot off the gas.

“In the first half when we pressured them we attacked and created chances but in the second half we did not pressure there defense as much.

“We talked about it at half time and how we should treat the game like it was zero- zero. But some of the players stated to believe in themselves a little too much.

“The game slowed down and the guys stopped dribbling and started playing a lot of ball side ways and backwards which is what we didn’t not want to do.

“So its disappointing to not take three points out of this game but we played good soccer against a very good team so we can definitely build on that.

“I don’t think Portugal did too much, maybe they had a little more desire in the second half, but you couldn’t tell.

“I think we started playing what I would call negative soccer and slowing it down. I knew if we didn’t keep the tempo up we would let them back in the game and that’s exactly what happened.

“We should be able to play an 80 minute match with equal intensity in both halves. Looking forward, like any young team we have to learn from our mistakes.

“We approach these games like qualifiers, we believe we can complete with anyone. The quality of our soccer is very good and the fact that we can play that way against Portugal shows we have come a long way.”

Top of Page

American Market Is Attractive

Barca, Real and Chelsea. Are there any bigger clubs on the planet? Maybe one or two but the point is they are teams that matter. Every word uttered and touch of the ball taken is analysed and dissected in minute detail, these institutions are worshipped.

In all four corners of the globe there is recognition whether it be through a player, the manager or the team. The familiarity ranges from 10-year-old kids in Sierra Leone carrying machine gun wearing Beckham on his Madrid top to the Thai grandmother espousing the merits of Ballack going to Chelsea.

These historical and prestigious brands are currently preparing to tour the U.S. This will undoubtedly please the lowest form of football fans, the soccer snob and will represent and important fillip to the administrators that have invested so heavily.

U.S. soccer deserves credit for attracting the aforementioned clubs along with Crystal Palace, Sheffield Wednesday, Everton, and Celtic. This represents palpable growth for the sport in the USA. Clubs have previously toured, but have not necessarily played U.S. opposition, taken the games very seriously or had the necessary levels of respect.

In previous years the tours were arguably about branding and a bit of a run out. Presently they are a stern football test that is part of a manager’s strategy. They knock the lethargy out of the players and get them into gear.

It is now apparent that the touring sides can’t just turn up and beat USL/MLS opposition. DC United asked some serious questions of Celtic that weren’t answered, because of player ability and movement not just effort and work rate.

The tours are excellent opportunities for the players to showcase their talent. European coaches’ are always looking for an edge. If the players can make the right impression a big money move to Europe can always go into the pipe line. Bobby Convey’s performances for DC United against Tottenham highlight the possibilities.

The Reading man’s progress also indicates, U.S. soccer at club level produces the right type of player to compete in domestic football. When the Royals face Fulham this season nearly 20% of the field will be made in the USA.

Given what the U.S. market can produce, does it really need European clubs promoting themselves in their backyard? It does inject a little hype and excitement, but the MLS player and product are now headed to the same ball park, the interest and intrigue should arguably be directed more exclusively to the MLS.

Euro snobs have got to be asking themselves questions when their fawning over players and teams based 4,000 miles away with marketing in mind.

Clearly, if the game’s aristocrats tour the land of the free, the appropriate platform should be reciprocated to the MLS/USL. Additionally talking to sources close to the great and the good of European soccer, the assumption at times is that the U.S. can learn from the Europeans. In many cases this is simply not the case.

Europe has many talented administrators, but it is fair to question whether they would get soccer off the ground like the MLS did. Major League Soccer represents ingenuity, enterprise, startling growth and opportunity.

Its worth noting when the EPL was created it was in reference to the sporting world created by the NFL, NBA and MLB. Continental Europe in turn reacted to the English Premier League. So in essence the U.S. soccer snob is submissive to something that in its present state was hugely influenced by the States.

Furthermore in the case of the EPL, despite a captive audience and huge capital investment, many clubs still operate at a loss, don’t play to capacity crowds, struggle to produce home grown talent and despite the money and enthusiasm cannot compete internationally.

It may be suggested that the result do not mean anything. This is reasonable enough, but the MLS and USL can only play what is in front of them. So it is important to prepare correctly and take full advantage of the situation.

The victories might be slightly hollow but beating these teams strips them of their aura and gives the players and management the confidence to progress. And as for the writers and soccer fans it’s our responsibility to be to equally passionate about ensuring U.S. soccer gets value out of Europe on its own terms.

Top of Page

U.S. might have been better off keeping devil it knew

SUNBURY ON THAMES, England (Sunday, July 16, 2006 - United States Soccer Federation president Sunil Gulati's decision to not renew the contract of Bruce Arena, America's winningest soccer coach, was not a surprise to the growing army of passionate soccer fans and, in some quarters, was received with much pleasure.

However, once emotions over the perceived disappointment of the World Cup campaign in Germany die down, is Arena leaving his post for soccer specific reasons or because wider influences and interests are being set in motion?

The media and fans have been quick to point the finger following the Americans' failure to progress from the qualifying group at the World Cup. The players lacked heart, Arena had run out of ideas and the officiating left a lot to be desired. This has culminated into the notion that in order for the U.S. men's soccer program to progress, the coaching staff needed to be freshened up and new ideas explored. However, while it is easy to comprehend such an argument, the facts do not appear to suggest the same.

To get a true perspective on the U.S. Cup performance, one only needs to look to America's campaign in France in 1998 -- painful isn't it? Furthermore, it highlights the side's progress and there-in part of the problem. Arena, through his success in South Korea and Japan, created a level of expectation that did not match the reality of U.S. soccer.

Getting to the quarterfinals in one tournament does not mean next time around means a trip to the semis, even if the squad is perceived to be better. Most nations go into the World Cup believing their side is superior to previous campaign.

Furthermore, given the quality of the opposition, I would go as far to suggest Arena showed the side was still progressing, even though it did not reach its full potential. But, then again, most nations don't. That is the nature of international football.

Given Gulati's acute level of intelligence, it would appear beyond the sound bites paying homage to Arena's contribution, he knew Arena was likely to represent good value for another four years. He will have learned valuable lessons from the tournament about his methods and his players, giving him the experience to get the U.S. out of any future World Cup group, irrespective of the opposition.

In the conversations I had, the word coming out of the national-team dressing room have been positive and imply a level of respect that is rare in modern football. This was enhanced by the fact that the players looked to themselves, rather than the figurehead, in relation to the supposed lack of success. So with strong performances, a huge amount of experience and control over the dressing room, where was the necessity in heading for managerial pastures new?

Gulati cites the length of Arena's reign as a problem and expressed a desire to freshen things up. It does make sense, but his motivation is likely to be based in his wish to run the administration his way and impose his mark on U.S. soccer history, as Arena's soccer in itself stands up to scrutiny.

Arena did not help himself with the media, but good soccer managers generally don't and moreover, on this occasion, it seems the scribes are looking forward to the new chapter in U.S. soccer.

It's difficult to see how the men's national team could have been in a stronger position for 2010 than by retaining him. Arena was fully aware of his new depth in understanding of World Cup soccer by empathically stating his case and can feel aggrieved that they didn't meet at Teterborough Airport rather than LaGuardia, given what he has achieved for the game. But as he might have even said himself, "Whadya gonna do"

Looking forward the Jürgen Klinsmann love-in is gathering pace. Gulati gets his high-profile man and U.S. soccer gets a shot in the arm of publicity and international recognition from hiring one of Europe's finest players.

But before we get too excited about this brave new world, let's take a look at the facts. The Jürger King, while being tasty marksmen, was also one of the best practitioners of diving in the early 1990's. Checking out some of his antics from the 1990 World Cup, one will be moved by his grace, elegance and sheer audacity.

My favorite effort occurred during the 1994 Champions League semifinal between AC Milan and his Monaco. Klinsmann, aggrieved by a heavy challenge from Alessandro Costacurta, vowed to take his revenge and, a matter of minutes later, the striker fell dramatically to the ground clutching his face. At the time, the assumption was the Milan defender had viciously assaulted the Blonde Bomber. His dramatic protestation only made Costacurta look even more guilty.

However, the TV replay painted a wholly different picture. If any contact did occur, it was minimal and around the legs. The referee duly sent off the center back, (he was also suspended from the World Cup final that year on similar grounds). leaving an indelible mark on an impressionable 15-year-old. The dive was so calculated and obvious, it was difficult to comprehend. Don't forget this was before the method form of diving which is now the mainstream, back in the day when players arched their backs and rolled over a few times for effect.

The following season, Klinsmann transferred to Tottenham Hotspurs after World Cup USA '94. His card was marked by the British press as a diver and mercenary. He proceeded to bang in 29 goals, pick up the writers' "Player of the Year" award and turned the diving accusations on their head by using it as a celebration now copied the world over.

Make no mistake -- Klinsmann is a thoroughbred winner of the highest caliber and has won major honors in Europe and internationally. Should U.S. soccer take on the son of a baker, he will create a mix that will leave the media and wider public feeling all soft and doughy.

However, a soccer fan's concern has to be purely the health of U.S. soccer and employing Klinsmann could set a dangerous precedent of creating short-term fixes. Is employing a foreign, unqualified, media savvy, politically motivated personality that suits immediate needs the right way to go? U.S. soccer has to address its long-term necessity of creating a level of coaching skill, confidence and understanding that cements its future as a world soccer power, ideally with "Made in America" written large.

Lets just hope the New York Pretzel, which should have been very appealing, hasn't been overlooked for a smaller less appetizing one simply because it's from the world of "authenticity." Remember, it will never be lost on an Englishman that the U.S. has a very good habit of doing things it's own way and in one's face.

Top of Page

World Cup Round Up
“I haven’t had a child yet but I’m sure this will be one of the greatest days of my life.” Marco Ortu – Albagiara, Sardinia- Italy

I remember watching polo in St.Moritz one winter, and being intrigued by a small group of people causing a scene outside the Cartier tent. I remember thinking to myself. “What was their problem, what did they want and where was security?”

Suffice it to say while I sat in a London pub this weekend watching the World Cup final surrounded by fat people, eating over-cooked food and drinking warm beer the boot was firmly on the other foot.

My American cousin clearly wasn’t on the guest list for the knock out stages despite my protests and having staggered in to the main event on reputation and untapped potential rather than seizing my destiny, I reverted to the 1990 metro sexual prototype, by crying, and convincing myself I couldn’t pass or score from 12 yards. But did any of it matter? I had been valiant…

The answer is of course it matters, because until 2010 all football debates lead to Rome. However, while I retreated into my comfort zone of misery, I did question whether the life of al fresco dining, good looking fashionable World Cup winning fan is any different from his Anglo Saxon mongrel friends?

Surprisingly, the life, rantings and self-righteous grandeur that is fully deserved, is not too dissimilar from the trials and tribulations of being a U.S. or England supporter, as Uber Juve and Italy fan Marco Ortu explained;

“To be honest with you I didn’t think we had the team to win it. I thought Cannavaro was too old, Del Piero was past it, and Totti wouldn’t be able to find his form after a long term injury.

“And then after we failed to put the U.S. away, I was ready to write us off. To not beat a side with nine men, after their performance against the Czechs, the frustration was immense.

“But as the tournament progressed Lippi was able to coax the best out of them, against the back drop of the chaos at home. In the past the team has been driven by a fear of losing rather than a desire to express themselves. Lippi was able to get them to relax.

“We were also able to play as a team, 10 different players scored it was like 11 gladiators going out on to the field for us.

Having witnessed Ortu go into meltdown following Juve striker Trezeguet’s golden goal winner in Euro 2000, against Italy, his insight on the Berlin final is intriguing;

“When Zidane hit the crossbar with the penalty we all celebrated, we thought he had missed. There was screaming and complete chaos, we simply did not realise it had been allowed.

“After 90, 94, 98, and 02 I was convinced the title belonged to France. People tend to forget for all the talk of England and Portugal’s so called “golden generation” Italy have won 5 of the last 8 Uefa U-21 championships. I thought it would be another massive let down.

“The penalties were excruciating, I was convinced Materazzi would miss, as part of some divine justice for getting Zidane sent off. I really thought he was going to be the villain of the piece.

Alas Materazzi and co. did come good and now Ortu can sit back and watch with curious amusement while England and U.S. fans argue at the velvet rope over structural, personnel and administrative reform longing to witness just once in their life time the glory of winning the ultimate sporting prize.

So that’s it for another four years. The wall chart is about to be laminated but glancing over a simple table of numbers and countries conjures many thoughts and memories that started over a month ago in Munich.

Like the old Super Bowl adage “Championships are built on Defense” the same is true for Italy 2006, Buffon, Cannavaro, and Guttuso, enough said.

While Zidane’s footballing skills come from another planet his basic human reasoning does not. His mother’s honor is far more important than the World Cup. Although how would he have reacted in 98?

If you’re going to win, win with style. Against the back drop of corrupt, Italy takes the title on penalties having been knocked out on PK’s in three of the last 5 World Cups. Jerry Bruckheimer apparently has the movie rights.

Diving- It’s wrong and endemic in the game. In fact I would go as far to say that like stepovers and free kicks, it has become something of an art form. Should it be accepted as part of soccer or stamped out? Discuss….

South Africa 2010- It should be amazing, let’s hope teams head there with an attacking expansive approach. Furthermore, having lived there, don’t be put off by media proclamations. Like any where in the world it has its problems, but then again so does London, the five boroughs and DC.

Best Goal- Maxi Rodriguez vs. Mexico, if you’re going to break a nation’s heart, do it with class.

Best Tackle- Rio Ferdinand v Portugal, Nuno Valente will be treading a little more carefully around Old Trafford.

Best Goalie – Gigi Buffon- worth every penny of his $62 million price tag.

Best Defender – Fabio Cannavaro- A true footballer and master of his game

Best Midfielder – Gennaro Gattuso- Could have taken any team to the semi finals

Best Striker – Miroslav Klose- I can’t honestly say I would want him on my team but you cannot argue with 5 goals.

Best Coach – Marcello Lippi – Kept his head while others in the tournament could not.

Team of Tournament – Buffon, Zambrotta, Marquez, Cannavaro, Lahm, Ronaldo, Gattuso, Ballack, Rodriguez, Zindane, Klose.

Quote of the Tournament – Graham Poll – Talking to Sky Sports about his Three Yellow Card fiasco.

"I had a personal phone call from the [Fifa] president, Sepp Blatter, urging me to continue. He didn't doubt my ability as one of the best referees in the world, and that has to touch you when he takes that trouble.

“…I had a message from David Beckham - not just saying 'You are a good referee', he has gone out of his way to be nice to me…

“I’ve seen the video and it doesn't look like Graham Poll refereeing. Any supporters, if they watch that last 10 minutes, would say it doesn't look like Graham Poll refereeing.”

Talking in the 3rd person is the reserve of boxers’ and rappers’ not referees. One shudders at the thought of him assuming the fans have come to watch him. Presumably when Beckham is not telling him how great he is, they’re chilling in the club in Tring. Next he’ll be wanting dressing rooms that are intimate but with space.

Top of Page

Erikkson leaves solid foundation for England to progress

SUNBURY ON THAMES, England (Tuesday, July 4, 2006) -- Okay, so England's prayers weren't answered and it was again unceremoniously booted out of a major tournament in a penalty shootout, but beneath the emotional and personally driven conjecture where does England currently stand and what will manager Sven-Goran Erikkson's legacy be?

The most obvious observation is that the team has improved since the era of Glenn Hoddle and Kevin Keegan. Both struggled with qualification, team performance and respect in the dressing room. Furthermore, in the major tournaments, they were emphatically underwhelming.

Since Erikkson has inherited the mantle of "the second most important job in England," qualification has been regarded as an non-issue, defensively, the side has been fundamentally sound and has beaten some of the top teams when it mattered, and the nation's expectation has credibly risen to expecting a last four position in major tournaments.

England has always been expectant but, in reality, staggered through qualification since 1997, was hopelessly underwhelming in the 1998 World Cup in France, and who can forget the horror show of Euro 2000.

Erikkson must be commended for his ability to get England out of World Cup group stages. Progress was assured and fortunately lacking in the drama of previous incumbents. It is also worth noting that he is the only England manger in the modern era to get out of the opening rounds in the European Championship on foreign soil.

The confidence of the team also improved. England has seldom approached penalties as confidently as it did Saturday against Portugal in Gelsenkirchen. England is usually petrified by the possibilities of the shootout. To alter this mentality is huge progress.

The players appeared far more confident than on previous occasions and didn't emit the nervousness highlighted by the likes of Gareth Southgate, Paul Ince and Darius Vassell. Furthermore, with Alexandre Ricardo making three saves for Portugal, we did witness World Cup history.

Player for player, England is also confident that it is as good as anyone in the world. This would have been difficult to argue under previous regimes due to inconsistent selection and lack of strategy. Six of the players' who played in Erikkson's first competitive game versus Finland were featured in Germany. A further development is the nature of the selection debate. Until the Germany squad was announced, the argument over the years had moved on from who should be selected to patterns of play and what system should be used. Again, this is the result of sound management.

Erikkson can also take credit for improving our record against the top sides when it mattered. Many forget not too long ago we took out Germany 5-1 in Munich, Argentina in Japan, and Switzerland and Croatia in 2004. It's difficult to imagine Keegan, Hoddle or Jonny Wilkinson producing the first two results or the manner in which they were achieved and, as for Euro 2000, were the tactics really, "Come on lads -- foreigners don't like it up 'em?"

Erikkson also developed a habit getting the team to win when playing badly and making England hard to break down. This is the mark of a good side and something Germany and Italy thrive on. One genuine criticism that can be leveled at the former England manager is his selection of strikers for Germany. It is something of a mystery as to why he could not find space for an extra striker. Surely it would have made sense to have found room for one of Jermain Defoe, Darren Bent or Andrew Johnson? But then again, it probably reflects his mental state at the time. He had reached a point in his tenure as England manager where he could not trust his employers, acquaintances, business contacts or even his long term girlfriend. In this light, it's probably easier to see why he made such decisions.

Another problem he failed to address was England's inability to keep possession. However, it is unlikely that it was for want of trying, given his previous clubs. Consequently, rather than come out and say, "English players are maybe overrated. They aren't exactly in abundance in the top four clubs" like any good coach, Erikkson had to reinforce the positives and hope for the best, which is exactly what happened.

Erikkson's legacy has been to set precedents in organization, effective qualifying, consistent selection and calm, cognitive coaching. He has taken a side from being played off the park by Finland to standing toe-to-toe with the best, and now facing up to penalties with a degree of confidence.

The next step for England will be to win in the shootouts and maintain a stronger hold of the ball. England's new manager Steve McClaren is capable of doing this, but will have to learn to cope with fans who refuse to recognize England's place in the football world and a vindictive media that appears to wantonly undermine the cause while it struggles to deal with the fact that it consists of glorified Monday morning head coaches.

When it comes to crowd noise, South Korea has the most dominant fans in the international arena while the likes of so-called soccer nations such as France struggle to get above the din of a Long Island summer soccer camp.

This weekend, the BBC 10 o'clock news led with England captain David Beckham's resignation. That soccer was first in the news was fantastic news for the sport, but then it was followed by news that two British soldiers had been killed by a rocket attack in Afghanistan. Make of it what you will.

Top of Page

Lessons To Learn, Experience To Gain

U.S. exit with lessons to learn and experience gained

The men’s national team left Germany with many ifs, buts and maybe’s. However, in the cold light of day they cannot have any complaints about their exit from the world’s greatest show on earth.

There has been much conjecture over the team’s hype, expectations and short comings, but in the wider scheme of the game and the nation’s soccer history the U.S. can be satisfied with their efforts.

The team, though ranked 5th in the world and final eight contenders in 2002, found itself in a group with three possible finalists. On top of this they went into the tournament without Cory Gibbs, Frankie Hejduk and a half-fit John O’Brien.

The expectation of a roster that consists of hardworking professionals at middle ranking Europeans clubs and products of a 10-year old professional league, should be that they are competitive and well organized, anything more is a bonus.

It is commendable that the side went into the tournament with respect and expectation, this in itself must be viewed as progress. Further more a true mark of the side’s development would be to compare the performances against the ‘98 team.

This tells you the U.S. soccer public should be satisfied the with team’s performance. Another aspect of the side’s maturity is its defense. The quality of the team in this area is impressive. The Czechs, despite their possession, had few chances.

Of the four shots they had on target, three went in! It took serious quality to break down the side and in reality the Czech couldn’t produce this form in the real pressure games. Against Italy the U.S. out shot the Azzuri 10-9 and had 54% of the possession with two men down for 45 minutes.

Writing about grit and determination makes dramatic copy, but the fact is Arena’s side controlled play when in possession and looked comfortable against the probable semi- finalists with only nine men. This is cast iron evidence of a good side.

Against the talented Ghanaians, the U.S. played on equal terms. On another day it could have all been very different, but that is the very nature of football at any level at any time from U-9 girls in Wisconsin to Arsenal v Barcelona in the champion’s league final.

There has been much talk about the team’s lack of creative flair and incisiveness. If the States were Argentina, England or Italy et al, it would be fair to find fault in this respect But the top sides have all lacked cutting edge at times and in some cases even with top level strikers re: France 2002.

Creative geniuses are rare commodities among the world’s elite. Rooney’s and Totti’s are at best cyclical products of fanatical football cultures.

U.S. soccer does not have the pick of the athletes and is generally practiced in structured environments. These types of players are potentially decades away, that’s just the way it is, there is no point in getting down about the system, with time and as the sports grows world class attacking talent will develop.

Another criticism that should be met with indifference is the squad’s failure to advance from the group stages. England and Holland were not even at the big show in 1994 and 2002 respectively. The next step on the disappointment ladder is having convinced yourself your team is worthy of the trophy, is to fail abjectly.

At the next level you then have a talented side that does not perform, before you reach the point of no return in your soccer addiction. The team is then robbed by lesser lights, dodgy/corrupt refereeing and/or FIFA’s version of Russian roulette, the dreaded, heart wrenching penalty shoot out.

The men’s national team and of course the U.S. soccer public have all of this to come. Spain, and Portugal have never picked up the title and England have only won it once. So in the U.S.’s short soccer history, professionally and as potential contenders, they have done well. Any notions of sweeping all before them in the world’s game is decades away.

The World Cup is an excellent conduit to draw the wider public into the sport. The World Cup has been getting higher TV ratings than the NHL, only the NBA and MLB to go! However, even as a soccer purist I would like the NFL to remain sacrosanct, go Chiefs!!!!

Elsewhere, England with the inclusion of Carrick (something I advocated in this column three months ago) look promising, nearly all of the quarter finalists are capable of winning the tournament. A Germany v Brazil final still seems likely but it really is that close this time around.

World Cup Fever: Acquaintance of the “fairer” sex: “Andrew, I feel we have become distant let’s do something this evening.”

AR “I’d love to hun but Ukraine are playing Tunisia and then France are taking on Togo. Let’s touch base in mid July.”

Top of Page

U.S. Find Their Mettle

After a deluge of overreaction and misguided criticism, the U.S. national team took the opportunity on Saturday to prove their credentials at the Fritz Walter Stadium in Kaiserslautern.

The result is not surprising given the nature of the two sides. However, the manner in which they achieved the 1-1 draw was unique in the history of the World Cup.

Referee Larrionda, who works as a clerk proved that pushing paper work is clearly poor preparation for do or die World Cup games between a powerhouse and emerging heavyweight.

There can be no complaints over Di Rossi’s wayward elbow or Mastroeni’s reckless challenge but Pablo why, why, why!!!!! From experience on the field it is likely that Pirlo, the victim of the “ankle breaker,” muttered something along the lines of their comparative Italian-ness...boom take that Andrea.

However, Larrionda made the wrong call on the Pope sending off. On another day both challenges could have been dealt with little more than a talking to. To administer two yellow cards for such tackles, suggests maybe the referee was looking to grab some of the headlines that where going to be splashed on a great game.

It was impressive to see the U.S. take the game to Italy. Totti quickly lost his fuse once he realised he was in a proper game, getting himself booked after five minutes.

Another notable aspect of the U.S. team was their gamesmanship. Unsurprisingly every time the stars and stripes, gained any sort of momentum through breaking up the play, invariably an Italian could be found lying on the floor in agony.

The U.S. admirably concentrated on the task at hand and when they needed to rolled around themselves and questioned the referee. I fully appreciate in many respects this is adverse to the national sporting culture, but the reality of international soccer is righteousness and moral buoyancy at times can hinder a World Cup campaign.

Technically and tactically, the U.S. were good value for their talent and as expected proved they can compete with anyone. Goals are not likely to cascade from this side, so giving up goals from appallingly set offside traps and bad communication must be eradicated.

Looking forward, the U.S. have done very well to put their destiny back in their own hands. The added bonus for the side is that Ghana have their goalscorers from the Czech game suspended, Gyan and Muntari.

Donavon is likely to come into his own given the space Ghana afford the opposition, and McBride, like Toni, will be a lot for them to handle. Athletically they will compete with the Ghanaians and are unlikely to falter like the Czech did in the last 20 minutes.

Over the longer term, I understand from sources of considerable national and international experience, that there is concern over the preference given the European based players, on the assumption that it relates to international performance. Johnson and Dempsey are case in point that the MLS can stand up to international competition.

One only needs to look to Greece in the 2004 European Championship and France again misfiring to realise the European domestic game, does into necessarily translate to international soccer. The opportunity of playing in a World Cup can also be perceived differently depending on your ambitions and economic situation.

Elsewhere, Argentina exudes class, but such performances carry little significance unless they can produce in the knock out stages. However, the luxury of bringing Messi, Tevez and Cambiasso off the bench sends out a strong message to the rest to the competition.

England are winning but do not look like world beaters. It will be interesting to see the performance the team produces against Sweden given England have not defeated them in 38 years. Will the team give Erikkson the reasoning he requires to keep Gerrard on the bench for the second round bringing some much needed balance to the side?

Brazil are moving through the gears. Australia put in a great performance but still lost. If this is Brazil playing badly, I am concerned for the team that has to deal with them in full flow. Whether Brazil, find that top gear is another question in itself.

Football Fever: the readers of this prestigious and distinguished publication deserve the most authentic and creditable soccer journalism. Reports in the London Times from Bulgaria have made me question my commitment to the cause. I don’t have World Cup fever merely a mild cough/ cold of some sort.

Two life sentence prisoners in Pazardzhik Penitentiary in Bulgaria have sewn their mouths up and refused to eat until their demands to watch the World Cup are met. They have left a small part of their mouths unstitched in order to smoke, but a fundamental point has been made. I know in my heart of hearts that anything Europe can do over time the US will do a whole lot better…

Top of Page

Andrew Rogers World Cup Roundup

US taught a lesson in the fine art of football

The Men’s National team received a harsh lesson in the realities of soccer circa 2006 in Gelsenkirchen yesterday. Where the Czech Republic were fleet of foot the US were flat, and of greater concern, while the former European Championship finalists displayed mental sharpness and dexterity the US were slow and ponderous.

Losing the first game of a major tournament does make life difficult, but many teams have lost and gone on and won the title, West Germany 54 and Argentina 78. So the set back in terms of getting out of the group is not particular debilitating, read England 86 and Argentina 90.

At the Arena AufSchalke Beasley and Donovan were proven to not be in the same class as Nedved and Rosicky. Some of the players’ suffered from stage fright as World Cup debutants and ultimately the best sides will pick apart a pragmatic and workmen like US National team.

Given the nature of the side and the lack of World Cup experience for some of the players’, what happened was understandable. Surely the defeat will spur the team on to highlight their true qualities against Italy?

It also seems likely that Donavon and Beasley will step up a gear. Donovan was anonymous. He will want to prove himself, while Beasley will be angered by how easily he was hustled out of the game. Eddie Johnson showed strength in character by imposing his game, and finding space with ease, he also suggests the best of the MLS can compete against Europeans.

Aside from being slow and nervous, the system the team uses, while logical does not reflect the MLS. The tactics employed are reminiscent of weak German national teams or lower end EPL sides. While this may be reflective of the coaching system and personnel at the country’s disposal, watching the MLS week in, week out, the rhythm and possession style used there is not prevalent in this situation. Maybe this is something that should be looked at in future.

With regards to the next two games, the US knows they can’t play any worse. They are a good team with decent players, so it will be interesting to see how they respond against Italy in K-Town.

As for England, maintaining possession is still a problem, along with Gerrard finding his game. The side definitely has shades of another glorious failure but this idea does not extrapolate the Rooney factor.

The concern is there could be a similar situation to Jan Koller’s ailment. His hamstring buckled under the unique and extreme pressures of the World Cup environment, having recently returned from injury. Rooney is like no other, but will not hold back, the management must be extremely cautious about bringing him in against Trinidad and Tobago, the World Cup is potentially a month long.

Elsewhere Ghana, Angola and Ivory Coast should be disappointed by there profligacy and lack of self belief. It is understandable given their inexperience, but the fact remains at times all three sides have games’ that can be un-playable.

Germany, should be very pleased with their effort in the opening game. Under pressure and without great experience running through the team they showed authority and fluidity, it will be exciting to see how they respond to bigger challenges.

World Cup Fever- close family and friends have been told by doctors’ that all they can do is hope and prey. Medical experts have declared I can make it through the next month. However, there have been no prior cases of patients waking up and talking about offside laws and tackles from behind, intertwined with overtime comebacks at Bridgeview Stadium and Ruiz equaling MLS goal scoring records. Oh the glory game.

Top of Page

Andrew Rogers World Cup Preview

June 1st 2006 Sunbury Health Clinic - London.

DJ: Mr. Rogers, this is the worst case I’ve seen in years, and I’ve been a practicing doctor since 1966.

AR: Fair enough Doctor Johnson. What is the prognosis, bottom line?

DJ: At best I would give you 4-5 weeks. In the worst case scenario you might never recover. Please listen Mr. Rogers, WCF (World Cup Fever) is a serious condition. Have you spoken to your company boss?

AR: I think I’ll take my chances on a 20 yr old with a dodgy metatarsal and a mentally fragile coach who can’t trust his long term partner or bosses. Now where’s that prescription for the organic, health conscious Doritos, dips and beer?”

Clearly I could be in better shape soccer fans, but I’ll hang in there to be part of what most of the world consider to be the greatest show on earth, and with 2.3 billion fans expected to watch it’s easy to see why.

In Europe and increasingly the US the World Cup is seen as an encompassing experience where everyone can get together, and enjoy the occasion in the knowledge that it is only a game…well kinda.

The wall chart is out, the groups draw and permutations have been analysed and I feel we could see a repeat of the 2002 final with a quirk of fate assisting Germany to the prize or at least the final.

Looking across the various geographical regions it is more patent than ever that there are no longer any games where a side can assume they can just turn up. Most teams have a star performer or a combined strength that must be respected or sides could run the risk of being dumped out of the tournament as illustrated by Portugal and France in 2002.

In Europe the contenders appear to be Germany, Holland and Italy. Germany as home nation has a considerable advantage, allied with tournament record that has seen them outside of the last 8 only once since their first triumph in 1954. Irrespective of any negative conjecture, the fact remains they can compete when it matters.

Holland have quality through out the side but historically lack the killer instinct. There is little to suggest this will change, but given the historical realities that go beyond my generation they will be extremely determined and motivated.

Italy can compete against any one and will not be intimidated by Brazil. The only real concern with regards to performance will be the fact that they basically have to play 3 ¼ final matches to get out of the group, this will take something out of them.

England has the caliber of players and experience to feel at ease against the best. However, as previously suggested on these hallowed pages, they need to be able to retain possession of the ball. Most goals seem to come from counter attacking play and set pieces at the moment.

The dividing line between winning and losing in the World Cup can be broken down into split seconds and inches. Had Sergio Conceicao’s shot go in off the inside of the post for Portugal versus’ South Korea in 2002 the US would not have gone through. This time around I do not expect any of the sides from the Asia or Oceania region to make in-roads, but anything can happen and probably will.

The term “dark horses” seems to have been coined for the African nations competing in the World Cup. I have little or no time for notions that teams such as Cameroon, Nigeria and Senegal were anything but accomplished sides with quality throughout the team. Accordingly, a little more should be expected from teams that so far have been congratulated for competing, and valiant failure. African football deserves better than this and anyone of the 6 competing teams can do some serious damage although inexperience could be a factor this time around.

South America- Brazil and Argentina again pose a strong challenge, although Argentina’s chances are hindered by the quality of the opposition in their group. As for Brazil they are formidable, maybe unassailable?

The Spain 82 side was mesmerizing. I’m not sure if there has been a better international side, but this team like the 82 lineup could suffer from overconfidence and must be wary of getting sucker punched down a side alley with the world seemly at their feet.

The United States are in a group of very slow and painful death…in the desert with out any water. But with a stronger and more experienced roster than 2002 expectations are understandably high, but getting out of the group would be a success in itself.

Talking to Alexi Lalas last week, he brought sound judgment and experience to the National Team’s World Cup debate;

“Would it be a failure to not get out of the group in 2006? Yes. Would it be the end of the world? Absolutely not, there are plenty of good teams that have bombed out in the first round.”

Should the US not make it out of the group they would be in illustrious company. In 2002 alone Portugal, France and Argentina missed the cut.

And finally, I do wonder if the strain of World Cup fever in the US could potentially be the most deadly given the way Ruiz is playing and Plotlin is shooting in the MLS at the moment. At this rate could we see US soccer fans forcing the country into lock down come July 9th?

Top of Page

An American Leads Watford To Premiership

Jay DeMerit of Green Bay Wisconsin made a significant contribution to his side’s play off final victory as North London club Watford FC reached the EPL this weekend. The Hornets maintained the upper hand through out the 90 minutes of a pulsating contest at the Millennium Stadium in Cardiff.

Watford broke the deadlock in the 25th minute. DeMerit in typical fashion forced his way through a packed penalty area to deliver a powerful header past the flaying arms of Leeds goal keeper Neil Sullivan. Eddie Lewis then went close for Leeds with a free kick in first half overtime but The Whites never really threatened the Watford goal.

One of DeMerits key attributes is his athletic ability, he physically dominates in the tackle and matches opposition players’ movement for movement, this allows him to control the space in which the opponents can play forcing them backwards or at least sideways.

The central defender’s class proved telling in the 54th minute when he shut down a promising attack from striker Robbie Blake. Watford then moved the ball up the field and scored the killer goal through a James Chambers deflected shot three minutes later.

Eddie Lewis was a victim of the watertight defense epitomized by DeMerit, this is also the second consecutive Cardiff final that he has found himself on the defeated side. Lewis can consol himself with the fact that he is now heading to Germany.

The introduction of Packer’s style determination will be a bonus to the Premiership. The other significant contribution from US soccer is that two of its players were competing in the final, clearly the United States role in the World’s game is growing on both sides of the Atlantic.

Champions League Final

The final in Paris proved to be entertaining but unfortunately for the fans, with Arsenal down to ten men for the majority of the game, they did not have the opportunity to watch the ‘dream’ final they had anticipated.

Clearly referee Terje Hauge, was not wrong in his decision to send off Jens Lehman but as he magnanimously admitted, in a Norwegian news paper "I would have liked to have taken a few more seconds before I made a decision…if I'd done that, I could have given a goal and given a yellow card as well."

However, on the biggest possible stage Hauge now has a track record of looking to make big decisions. His other crucial sending off came against Chelsea when Barcelona visited Stamford Bridge earlier this season in the second round of the Champions League.

Like the coaches and players- referees are only human and are entitled to make errors, however, in recent years the dynamic has slightly changed. Referees now receive world wide exposure and have better conditions then ever before, but with such a significant economic imbalance between those who officiate and those who play, one can understand any inclination they may have to get ahead; making big calls is part of this.

Collina benefited hugely from his on the field persona and now endorses cars and appears on the cover of computer video games. Ideally a referee makes his most significant contribution to a contest when he sets the tone for a game where he is not seen and his whistle is not heard.

For all those associated with soccer, play offs and Champions League finals bring wonderful excitement and highs. However football is not always goals, thrills and spills. The town of Ballymena, Northern Ireland which recently hosted the Men’s US U-17 National Team in an international tournament are suffering from the devastating news that sectarian attack took place on May 8th that resulted in the death of 15yr old Michael McIlveen. This is a terrible shame and a sad and tragic contrast to the joys of the prestigious tournament only a few weeks early.

In London, England, Queens Park Rangers (former club of Tampa Bay Rowdies Star Rodney Marsh) are dealing with the news of the death of promising Academy player Kiyan Prince. Like McIlveen he was 15 years old. He was stabbed to death outside his school last Thursday- trying to break up a fight.

Prince’s athletic talent was not just limited to soccer but in the world’s game he was described as being in much the same mould as Theo Walcott who is currently training with the England camp. Academically his pedigree was as strong as his footballing skill.

In both instances such tragic losses and the grief the respective families must be feeling put Association Football in it’s proper context.

Top of Page

The Oldest and Most Prestigious Cup
Competition in the World

“Clearly, the spirit and romance of the world's most prestigious club knockout competition is alive and well. The FA Cup is still epitomized by giant killings, end-to-end football and charged atmospheres. Consequently, the football world around the FA Cup has evolved in order to emerge from the huge shadow its glory has cast and takes for granted.”

Just when those not strictly of Association Football where ready to write the epitaphs of the world’s greatest knock out cup competition, the FA Challenge Cup comes back off the ropes and delivers one of the finest matches in the history of the game.

This publication’s discerning readers would not have been surprised by West Ham’s performance, given Pardew’s FA Cup pedigree and the club’s performances this season. However, as John Hackworth (The Men’s U-17 National Team Head Coach) recently pointed out on these pages when his side succumbed to the Czech Republic, “The simple fact is we can compete. The players need to start appreciating the critical moments in the games.”

West Ham’s starting XI- averaged 25 yrs, and their captain Nigel Reo-Coker is only 22. With a little more experience on the biggest occasions the result would not have been in doubt. As Hackworth points out, games are won and lost on “moments.” The critical moment in Cardiff arrived in the first minute of second half injury time.

West Ham’s right back Lionel Scaloni was the unfortunate player left to face up to the situation Once the Argentinean had regained possession the Reds were falling as if they had been sniped from the gantry. On the edge of his own area he was confronted with players strewn across the field, naturally he felt obligated to knock the ball out so they could be treated.

In itself there was nothing wrong with these actions, however, once he had decided to play the ball out, the Liverpool players should have retreated and allowed West Ham to regain possession with space and time, and permitted him to make his clearance.

Instead, German international Ditmar Hamman restarted play with a throw in that was equivalent to a curve ball. Scaloni struggled to deal with its trajectory, so Liverpool’s players’ closed the small space they had already afforded him. The rest is football history, but this is the moment on which the game turned… make of it what you will.

The Oldest and Most Prestigious national Team in the World

On the international scene, after much deliberation England finally has its new manager. The process in finding the right person had its flaws but the decision made by former TV executive Brian Barwick created a 4 month long drama and media debate, very clever.

His choice, Steve McClaren, is an honest, qualified, and competent football coach. His pedigree and experience are first class, and more importantly for England, he now has considerable experience at international level as an assistant to Erikkson. In making McClaren head coach, England is already slightly ahead of most nations for 2008. He knows the set up and is familiar with the role. Therefore when he takes full charge, instead of learning what to do, he can concentrate on strategy and tactics.

However, there is concern that this advantage will be ground down. Certain elements of the press have already jumped into his private life, and because most sports writers are familiar with him from the domestic circuit, and by virtue of his nationality, they will feel a certain sense of entitlement and familiarity.

Allied with the fact that he lacks the gravitas of a Ferguson, Mourinho or Wenger, one can envisage if the European Championship qualifying campaign does not run smoothly (and most do not), the press knives will probably be out, and/or they will back the manager into a corner and try to dictate the national team’s agenda. This is truly frightening; given, only four months ago some leading journalists were calling for Rio Ferdinand to play in a midfield holding role usually occupied by a Gattuso, Reyna or Keane.

Readers, I must be clear about the consideration that went into the Ferdinand proposal - a solitary performance in a cup competition against the mighty Wolverhampton Wanderers.

However, this is more evidence than Sven Goran Eriksson needed in picking 17 yr old Theo Walcott. I am in no position to question the decision but there is not even enough evidence to suggest he is a boy wonder. Andrew Johnson and Jermain Defoe of Crystal Palace and Tottenham Hotspurs respectively will feel understandably aggrieved.

The concern in this particular situation are the comments of Arsenal Head Coach Arsene Wenger. His credentials and football acumen can never be questioned and are wholly applauded but in this instance to advocate, “if Sven calls me to ask should he take Walcott, I would not stop him. Theo needs games but he has something very special,” is too strong. Wenger will never imply Walcott should not go, but to infer his international class, when he can’t find a place for him in the Arsenal line up, or even on the bench against Sunderland or West Bromwich Albion, would appear dismissive and perhaps self serving.

However, judging by the national press, the lead appears to come from the top of the Arsenal organisation. Their Vice Chairman David Dein was not on the committee selecting the English Head Coach, having had a role in Erikkson’s appointment. Within a month the man with Uefa Chairmanship ambitions was on the committee and had apparently determined to whom the job should go, only to be rebuffed by the coach taking Portugal to the World Cup finals. Phil Scholari.

Any one associated with football can only have admiration for an administrator who bought heavily into soccer during the early 80’s, and has had a strong role in creating football in Europe as it is. But in the current situation, it would appear that Arsene Wenger was the ideal candidate.

Arsenal are moving to a new $720 million stadium next season and Dein has a personal stake in the club reputedly worth in excess of $60 million. Would Dein want to lose Wenger at this stage of Arsenal’s development? I would be interested to know who would take a back seat in such circumstances.

So as matters stand, next month England and Erikkson’s only fit and “proven” striker will be Peter Crouch, a player Rafael Benitez subbed with 20 minutes to go with his side 3-2 down in the Cup Final. Thus we have a potential situation where by McClaren, getting frustrated by England’s lack of cutting edge, could tell Eriksson, “well Sven this is kinda my job now, lets bring on Theo.” i.e. the man Dein didn’t want in charge understandably breaks rank against the man Dein put in charge, over a player Dein’s head coach will not play - but feels is good enough to play for England.

Erikkson would be entitled to think to himself, “Where did it all go wrong?” “I told my employers I was going to meet an Arab businessman and got their approval, it transpired that I was being set up by a newspaper, but having got their approval they decided to terminate my contract after Germany. The board fully supports me, but have offered my job else where, in fact I’m standing next to that man, and in England they call this support.”

On a less surreal note, it is pleasing to see two English sides in domestic European finals, it is regarded as a sign of the strength of your league if your sides do well in Europe. In the 90’s Italy were top dogs although it now seems slightly opaque as to what exactly they were in the ascendancy of.

On an even more refreshing note, either Jay DeMerit or Eddie Lewis (both immaculate footballing professionals) will be in the promised land of the Premiership next week. DeMerits star is certainly on the rise as he will be appearing in USA Today this coming Thursday or Friday.

FC Dallas also have a lot to cheer about they have made it into the hollowed pages of soccer magazine FourFourTwo, the Sport Illustrated of Europe. Their profile has been highlighted in recognition and adherence to the fundamentals of team work and organisation. Congratulations. July Issue out June 3rd.

Top of Page

U.S. U17s Lose Heartbreaker In Ireland

“Adversity is the first path to truth. Prosperity is a great teacher; adversity is greater.” Vince Lombardi - What it takes to be #1.

The US U-17’s Men’s National Team suffered a heartbreaking defeat at the hands of a technically proficient and confident Czech Republic team in the final of the Ballymena Tournament in Northern Ireland on Friday.

The 1-0 defeat was the 4th consecutive loss in the final at Ballymena for the US. After an apprehensive first half they found themselves behind to a Josef Sural goal on 30 minutes. The U.S. came out in the 2nd half with a new found composure and focus and were unlucky not to at least level the game having created a number of chances and hit the woodwork.

On a more positive note Seattle Native Ellis Mcloughlin picked up the tournament MVP award for his accomplished performances and two goal and two assists Unaware that he had won the award until we spoke he commented, “We played well but are very disappointed to have lost the final, thinking about the award now- I’m happy. Receiving the MVP s a huge honor and I’m very proud but it’s difficult to think about with the defeat.”

Fortunately for the promising striker he was able to share his joy and sorrow with his loved ones, “Luckily my mom and dad came out here for the tournament, its been great to be able to share it with them, my goal now is to get on to the roster for 2007, these were our first international wins, I’m sure more will come.”

Stand out center back Tommy Meyer from St Louis, Missouri, was also philosophical about the day’s events, “Maybe we upped our energy too late…we expected to play like we did against Northern Ireland, the motivation wasn’t quite right, you have to find that focus. In the second half we gave everything but nothing seemed to go our way.”

His father, a former indoor pro player has been a constant source of support; “I’ve spoken to him every night before I hit the sack, he relaxes me, gives me advice and confidence. I’ve enjoyed England and Northern Ireland, this has been the best I have played since I arrived at Bradenton. I’ve learnt a lot about myself and soccer on this trip.”

Coach John Hackworth, was frustrated but clearly optimistic about dealing with bitter but sweet irony that his side are capable world beaters but have not quite been able to realize it yet;

“We’re pretty disappointed that we lost that game, but you can’t win them all. We thought we had it right, but in the first half didn’t play as we can. At half time I challenged them to play for their country and not to play with fear but respect. I told them to let it ride, go out there and play like you know you can, your America’s best players, representing your country. Afterwards I told them we would never play like that again and not win. In the 2nd half we proved we can play like champions and be champions.”

Hackworth’s conviction is borne out by recent narrow losses to Brazil and Argentina and now the Czech Republic, “We’re capable of beating the very best; we have to make that next step. I’m very optimistic about 2007 and the team. We will not keep making the same mistake, this is the best lesson we have ever been given. You have to come out and play your best, you must believe in what you have been doing. Maybe they need a little reminding in this respect. They need to understand they are as good as anyone in the world, comprehend that knowledge and act on it. The simply fact is we can compete. The players need to start appreciating the critical moments in the games, then we can go on and win these ties. We have been told it is the best final they have seen in Ballymena. It’s our first loss in a 17 day trip; the quality is clearly there on the field. I’m very proud, there is a lot we got out of this trip, 2007 is our only focus right now we don’t look past our next hurdle.”

The overall success for the U.S. was not just on the field, Tournament Director Alan McKinstry, was wholesome in his praise of not only the Men’s team but those who helped make it happen:

“It’s been an excellent week of football. This has been the 7th year we have run the event, it’s been great fun and we feel privileged that we have created something of such prestige and caliber. To attract sides from across Europe and the other side of the Atlantic is a great achievement

It’s been a privilege to have the youth team of a side ranked so highly in the world (the USA), we love having them participate here. They are a great side, they can go any where in the world, it is testament to the organizers that sides like the U.S. want to come along year after year.

To me the thing that stands out most about the U.S. team is the fierce determination to win and the pride they have in playing for their country. The U.S. U-17’s men’s national team have been wonderful ambassadors for their country, from John Hackworth to the players and backroom staff, they have been a pleasure to work with, they are a real credit to football and the USA.

It was a great shame the U.S. did not win, they played some great soccer and things might have been different with a little luck. I’m sure many of the players will go to play for the full national team and do well in the MLS and Europe. Both Jonathan Spector and Arjen Robben played in the tournament. Hopefully they can win it next year.”

Top of Page

US U-17’s Head to the Ballymena Tournament
in Great Shape

The US U-17’s national team rounded off an excellent week in Northern England with a 2-1 win over Tranmere Rover’s Academy. I caught up with the coach and a couple of the players before they head to the Emerald Isle to play in the prestigious Ballymena Tournament.

In an exuberant and reflective mood U-17 coach John Hackworth explained;

“Our objectives for the U-17 program here in England was to expose the squad to a more intense soccer environment, we took them to Premiership games to show them a different kind of atmosphere and passion that’s completely different to the US.”

In the four games his side has played they were undefeated, scoring 13 goals and conceding 7. The victories have included opponents such as the North of England Regional team and the widely acclaimed Liverpool academy.

“We played some good soccer in parts, the training camps went well and the players developed well with our different systems and styles based around the 4-4-2 formations. My principals are to attack, defend and work in transition as a team as well as learn to exploit and adjust to other teams’ weakness and strength.”

Clearly the tactics and strategy for the week were extremely successful, Hackworth, formally Head coach of University of South Florida also offered some useful insight to the thousands of youth coaches across the US.

“We have a squad of 22 players, we tried to give every player at least 2 full games, I consider myself to be a youth coach, I feel you can never truly develop a player unless they play full games, subbing them in and out doesn’t help. When you keep them in, that’s when you see their character and they progress technically, tactically, physiologically and physiologically. I want players to find their own game. I’ve seen a lot of coaches telling the players what to do; we let the players make their own decisions, that is the best environment for a player.”

Hackworth’s scientific and methodical approach is reflective of the entire US youth development program, looking further ahead he added;

“The future of the program is very healthy, we do a great job with the best talent in the country, our approach may differ to other countries but the future for the national team is very good.”

Hackworth also spoke very warmly about the host country, “I enjoy English food and love the place and people, my favourite is fish and chips, I look forward to eating more in Northern Ireland.”

The players were also in an ebullient mood. Midfielder Kirk Urso from Lombard, Illinois scored a 25 yard free kick in the 2-1 defeat of Tranmere, “getting a chance to watch Premiership soccer and train with Manchester United coaches was amazing. English football is very physical, they challenged strongly in the 50- 50’s, its very intense and passionate…it’s all about tackle.”

Goal Keeper Josh Lambo hails from a family of soccer pedigree, his brother is a freshman starter at the University of Wisconsin;

“This is my 3rd time here. I love the passion and atmosphere. I’ve been in something of a slump recently but coming here helped me get back my love of the game. Watching Manchester United training made me realize you can be intense and enjoy the sport. It is my dream to play in England and follow the footsteps of Tim Howard, he overcame obstacles to be voted Manchester United’s player of the year in his first season.”

Talking to Lambo it is apparent that his brother also plays a strong role in his life, “I’ve been talking to him everyday, he’s my biggest role model and has always supported me. He helps me calm my nerves; I wouldn’t be in this position without him.”

Looking ahead Lambo added, “I’m looking excited about the challenge of the Ballymena Tournament in Northern Ireland. Long term I am looking forward to the World Cup and if not college, the MLS or playing overseas.”

The US U 17’s tour of Northern England has been successful both on and off the field; the country’s best players from the 1990 age group have matured as people and soccer players, and under the leadership of John Hackworth are all likely to feature prominently in the future of US and World Football.

Top of Page

To Dive or Not to Dive

“Yes it was a handball but sometimes this is the game, I don’t know how to explain. The ball comes to me and I can’t do nothing but this. Sometimes I dive, sometimes I stand. But I don't care about this. In football you can't stay up all the time... I don't dive, I play my game.”

Didier Drogba - March 25th 2006

Cheating, an infamous enterprise that elicits shock and horror when exposed, and in this instance, because the words fell from a $38 million striker, sparked a week-long media debate.

Much of the conjecture was clouded with romantic notions of a fairer time in days of yore, suggestions that culpability lies with overseas imports, and damnation of behavior that is reflective of a society in moral decline. The reality for association football, you will be happy to hear is somewhat removed from such statements and ultimately reflects well on the game.

Firstly, deception is not something new to English soccer. Historically its motivation has been to undermine and usurp creativity, rather than enable goal scoring opportunities. This stems from the machismo that was the game and impart still is- players have to prove they can “get stuck in” with heavy tackles, these are viewed as a communication tools, to let the opposition “know what you are about.”

The Leeds sides of the 70’s were notorious for their gamesmanship. Colin Mafham of the Sunday Express recalls; “The team could be ruthless and very cynical. They introduced a different kind of gamesmanship to the league that was off the ball and behind the referee’s back. It is fair to say they were educated in Europe. I think they realised if you couldn’t beat them you had to join them.”

It is also worth noting, that when it has been in England’s interest, the nation has happily overlooked its own indiscretions. Michael Owen in the 1998 and 2002 World Cups’ “felt contact” in the opposition penalty area, but against such adversaries he was “fighting for his country” and “doing what it took for the team.”

The way the argument has developed in recent times stems from two factors; English clubs reintroduction to European football and the investment in football talent outside of the domestic market. This presented the English spectator with a different mentality in gaining the competitive edge. Rather than seeking advantages and stifling creativity through intimidation and violence, the players entering the game, and being viewed were trying to create scoring opportunities and dead ball situations through falling under little contact and/or pressure from the opposition.

This created a lot of consternation among English fans who perceived their actions to be lacking in scruples and alien to their values of the game; in reality it represented a different ideology on what constituted cheating- an admission of pain and/or physical weakness does not sit will with the supporters psyche.

Consequently, the public reaction to Drogba realizing their opinion regarding foreign players’ attitude and deposition is somewhat puzzling. Why vilify him? In part it is because it suits the construct of a footballer in society but we’ll cover that at a later date. Football fans must see this as a missed opportunity, a player has put his hand up and spoken a degree of truth, and has suffered a reaction worse than if he had lied. This suggests the game cannot move forward because it does not want to, and is evidence if ever there was any needed, as to why footballer should not be candid… they’re damned either way.

The hysteria that Drogba sparked is somewhat hypocritical. Like you and I he is an employee paid to do a job, and like any good workers he gets the job done for the good of the team and the company. When you are being paid millions for your role, the pressure you are under and your motivation are likely to push you a little further to gain a competitive advantage. Soccer players from outside of England generally manifest this in different ways, however, it is also fair to say it is easier to see fault in those outside of your culture, when in actuality it exists amongst English players as well.

Cheating of any sort is wrong but ultimately Drogba’s comments place soccer in a favorable light in if one was to compare its’ moral buoyancy with many other result driven industries. In other spheres of life do opposing organisations stop competing when someone goes down or in the case of Arsenal v Sheffield United in their 1999 FA Cup clash; replay the negotiation because an unwritten rule was intervened?

For the “controversy” to take such a strong hold on the public conscience and sustain a week of passionate debate reflects well on the health of the game. Drogba’s actions also suggest the moral standards are relatively high in the scheme of sports. It does not have any of the unsavory incidents of Rugby or Hockey that would result in prison sentences if they were not a playing field/rink. Furthermore a footballer’s indiscretion does not put at risk people’s employment, pensions or start wars.

This summer in Germany we will see at some point one national side “cheat” another, or “take a dive” in a big game, as supporters of the game we should look forward to the ensuing media meltdown, cooling of diplomatic relations, and elusive proof of why the opposition nations cannot be trusted, oh the beautiful game.

Top of Page

Confidence growing in U.S. Soccer

146 BC - As the final day of his campaign drew to a close, Scipio Africanus stood watching Carthage burn. His face glowed with the fire of the setting sun and the flames of the city, but no smile of triumph crossed his lips. No gleam of victory shone from his eyes. Instead, the Roman general burst into tears.

In the fading light of that dying city, Scipio saw the end of Rome itself. Just as Rome had destroyed others, so it would one day be destroyed. The great conqueror and extender of empires, saw the inexorable truth: no matter how mighty it may be, no nation, no empire, no culture is immortal.

Polybius – 3rd Punic War
With the announcement that the LA Galaxy are to share a strategic alliance with Chelsea FC, US soccer can give itself a well deserved pat on the back for developing a soccer product that can draw such admiring glances and courtship.

Recent transactions, innovations and comments involving Red Bull, Chelsea and David Beckham, represent proof if ever there was any required as to how far US Soccer has come in recent years and an indication to what direction it is headed in.

The $100 million investment by drinks giants Red Bull into the MLS’ New York franchise is truly visionary and highlights the long term future of the game to be both promising and real. I also think over time we will come to see the size of the investment to be minor in relation to its future worth and status.

To apply a context to the size to of the New York Red Bulls deal, Alexandre Gaydamak recently invested $20 million dollars in Premiership Club Portsmouth FC, this represented 50% of the organisation, a guaranteed income from the League and media networks, sell out crowds most weeks, and highly prized development land behind the ground.

However, the idea and opportunity to build a world class New York soccer side is ultimately far more captivating if one has the time, finance and expertise to develop it.

With regards to Chelsea FC’s alliance with the LA Galaxy, again it can only be good for US Soccer that they are in a position to attract such interest from the economic powerhouse of Europe. With Chelsea’s global reach and recent links with the Chinese market, its association with LA can at the very least offer a greater level of exposure for one of the MLS’ marquee franchises.

David Beckham, recently reiterated comments he made in 2003 regarding his desire to play in the USA in the medium to long term future. At a time when other major brands have moved into the market, his comments make sense. The media attention, finance and crowds he can draw are an attractive prospect to any football market. Furthermore, his athletic professionalism and family man image are great examples for any aspiring soccer player.

Europe’s recent interest in the MLS conclusively shows how far the league has come. 11 yrs ago it did not have any crowds or teams, now there are 12 franchises, and attendances averaged 22,000 for the Round 1 fixtures. It is also in part responsible for a national team that currently sits #5 in the world.

While certain US Soccer “aficionado’s” may feel its product does not match up to the European model, let it not be forgotten that the old world had over a 125 years to get it right, and there were no competing sports products or skeptical media networks and audiences.

Life may still not be idyllic in US Soccer and it may have to deal on a day to day basis with bigger and more dramatic stories from other sports franchises - I remember gearing up for the Long Island Rough Riders season along side the Yankees, Mets, and Islanders Fantasy Hockey – but if one looks at the bigger picture the US public now has a league comparable with the English Championship only ten years after its inception, a national side that made the World Cup _ finals and in Red Bull, Chelsea and David Beckham have three of the most prestigious brands fully aware of the country’s soccer potential, now

Top of Page

FA Cup Glory

When Charles Alcock, noted player, journalist and administrator proposed the first FA Cup competition in 1872 few would envisage that it would go on to become known as the greatest club knock out competition in Association Football. In front of 2,000 people Morton Betts scored the winning goal for The Wanderers, a team made up of educated loafers and university students.

An estimated 500 million people will tune in to watch this year’s final. However, the impression in the home of soccer is that the FA Cup is not what it once was.

In an unprecedented move, the FA moved all four ¼ final play off fixtures to the mid week; in order to accommodate the National sides World Cup preparations. This provided an ideal snap shot to assess the health of the competition.

Much of the glamour and excitement the competition has created throughout its history has been attributed to the notion, that the smaller sides can, and do, upset bigger and more prestigiuous clubs. In recent years it has been suggested that these “giant killings” have disappeared, and that the competition has become too predictable.

The reality is that the upsets do occur, and with reasonable frequency. If anything it is surprising, given the redistribution of capital from the TV network, which has created an increasingly acute disparity since 1992. What has evolved recently is the intensity and saturation of football with media attention, placing an unrealistic expectation on the “giant killing”. This year’s competition produced two amazing shocks; Brentford and Leyton Orient from Leagues 1 and 2 respectively defeated Premiership opposition.

However, the increased coverage has exposed a fall in attendance in relation to crowd sizes for league games. Stadia that are usually full are often televised with banks of empty seating, and attendance figures generally show cup ties on the whole draw fewer spectators than can be expected on average.

This does not reflect badly on the competition. In the Premiership, season tickets range in price from around $700 to $1500. Economically it makes complete sense for fans to not want to incur the cost of attending an extra game, especially against pliable opposition, especially given there is a good chance the game could be highlighted on the tube. A similar pattern emerges when assessing the lower leagues, although naturally the attendance does spike when the big guns arrive.

Another area of concern has been the game’s atmosphere. The recent West Ham United cup ties conclusively proved that the noise the games can generate cannot be equaled. In both matches, spurred on by the crowd, the sides threw off their defensive shackles producing stirring end to end football that encapsulated what fans across the world love about the competition. Despite the ground not being full to capacity the stadia roofs where happy for their reinforced steel.

Chelsea and Liverpool games did not replicate this, but supporters will always find it difficult getting excited over one sided affairs. Thus the perception of a lack of atmosphere or attendance simply correlates with the fixture, rather than the decline in supporter’s conviction, regarding merits of the competition.

One therefore has to ask what drives this opinion and what if any basis does this argument have?

Firstly, as previously alluded to, the coverage of football is in rude health. With radio phone ins and 24/7 news coverage, there is a requirement to promote debate and conjecture about the world’s favourite game. The deep history, and romance of the competition, conjures wonderful memories of packed crowds and great football, when this does not happen because, A/ The fans cannot stretch their budget or B/ One side dominates another. What is left for the networks to talk about? Suggesting the FA Cup just produced another result is unlikely to sell, so more emotive questions like the health of the competition will arise.

More revealing evidence as to the nature of this perception can be found in the economics of the trophy. Between 2004-7, nearly $2.4 billion dollars will be invested into EPL clubs, and the UEFA Champions League guarantee’s roughly $20 million to the last 16 teams. Conversely, the FA Cup offers around $400,000 if you make it on to TV, and $1.6 million or $ 3.2 million go to the finalists and winners respectively. The prize money in the early rounds would struggle to cover Kieran Dyer’s weekly wages or medical insurance.

On this basis, it is understandable as to why clubs from the Board down may feel their priorities lie elsewhere. However, despite the financial realities of English Club football, the thirst for FA Cup glory has not diminished. West Ham Head Coach, Alan Pardew, fielded weakened sides to prepare for FA Cup ties in two recent Premiership fixtures at a loss of six points. This will potentially cost the club at least $3.2 million as a consequence of a lower league position (each place in the league is worth $800,000). When you then build in the increased effort and distraction from the league, the club is faced with the prospect of dropping more points, prize money and losing out on a place in the Uefa Cup.

Pardew’s decision not only reflects the allure of the Cup but offers an implicit indication that the trophy is far from dead. Financially it would be “prudent” to concentrate on the league, but English football is ultimately driven by community, pride and the pursuit of glory.

Pardew’s strategy is also consistent with his history as a player. Having played against the formidable Liverpool at Anfield in their 9-0 demolition of Crystal Palace, he would later that season score the overtime winner, in a 4-3 victory against the same opposition in the FA Cup semi final in 1990. Stunning.

Clearly the spirit and romance of the world’s most prestigious club knock out competition is alive and well. The FA Cup is still epitomized by giant killings, end to end football and charged atmospheres, consequently the football world around the FA Cup has evolved in order to emerge from the huge shadow its glory has cast and takes for granted.

Top of Page

Mourinho: Artist or Artisan?

“Please don’t call me arrogant, but I’m European Champion and I think I’m the special one.” Jose Mourinho -June 2004.

Few would disagree with the assertion that Jose Mourinho is special, very special indeed on the landscape of English football, but of his credentials which ones define him as being out of the ordinary?

As a manager he has great pedigree, but his rise to the top has been reasonably linear in relation to contemporaries such as Eriksson, Wenger, and Houllier.

The aforementioned coaches all had little distinction as players, but overcame this by being brilliant at articulating technical and strategic instruction, combined with an inherent understanding of the unique disposition of the soccer player’s mentality.

Like Mourinho they learnt their craft as assistants or at minor clubs and worked their way to the top. Therefore, while Mourinho is certainly a great coach, he shares his place on the pantheon of successful managers and has followed in a path well worn by many others.

So why does the son of Sutebol draw such attention? In part it comes it comes down to the nature of his personality. Mourinho exudes charisma; any number of managers could and do articulate similar opinions, but struggle to deliver their thoughts so emphatically or more importantly with a Mediterranean drawl.

Furthermore his comfort in dealing with the media sets him apart, most do not have the inclination or confidence to go toe to toe with the games’ journalists’ and editors’. Conversely Mourinho proverbially jumps into them two footed with his studs showing.

When you then combine this with his self assurance and smoldering Latin good looks, as a package you are dealing with someone who is very special indeed…for the media.

The reality of Mourinho in the English football market is that he is now in a position where by he drives the media industry. The Chelsea manager sells newspapers, creates headlines, and delivers sound bites. An absence of activity on his part creates a vacuum that is filled with stories of “Ferguson must go,” incidentally his team currently sit 2nd in the league with a League Cup under their belt, or the pincer movement of “Sven Out” despite a drama free qualification campaign and a healthy libido for his age.

The extent to which Mourinho has moved football editorial from its bread and butter copy was eloquently highlighted at the beginning of this week, when he arrived at Barcelona airport. The ensuing media scrum surrounding his arrival was comparable to Madonna or Michael Jackson in their pomp, albeit it they were welcomed not spat at.

However, Mourinho’s bottom line is results in football not PR stunts in the Basque Region, and in this respect at the Nou Camp Chelsea’s head coach proved that maybe he is not so special.

Like Wenger and Ferguson, in their earlier European Campaigns his side looked ill equipped to deal with the best of European Football. Out thought and technically not as proficient, the side struggled to deal with the questions continental sides can ask of English club football.

While historically this is understandable, neither Wenger or Ferguson claimed to be the special one or had unlimited resources at their disposal.

The result also exposed certain limitations in his coaching philosophy, Chelsea’s strength is found in there organisation and defending. Barcelona had enough skill not to feel pressurized by this tactic, forcing Chelsea to create chances rather than exploit plays that they had broken down. It was evident that Robben, Cole, and company have not yet necessarily gained the experience to be confident in such situations.

Again sides do develop and have to go through stern learning experiences to appreciate the nuances of European football, but the fact remains that given the opportunity to create a side as he wishes, he has chosen utility and functionality over flair and creativity. Strategically this is the right move, in order to win a Premier League Campaign, additionally why change a style that has been successful thus far in his career. Arguable, for Mourinho to be considered special in the wider scheme of football management he is required to progress the team a little further.

Another area where Mourinho excels, is his perception of the soccer’s bigger picture. Many clubs have bought their way to success such as Blackburn and Lazio but neither has made a similar impact.

Traditionally on a European and domestic level, Chelsea FC have had little resonance in terms of success or reputation. Under Mourinho’s stewardship they are now sworn enemies of Uefa and the world biggest football club in Barcelona. It is certainly not lost on Jose’ that if you’re going to have a rival, go to the top of the table, and create the best possible drama against the most formidable adversary.

As a man manager Mourinho can not be faulted either, he has never been afraid to drop players for not adhering to his fundamentals. Shaun Wright-Philips and Joe Cole at times have lacked concentration and/or positional discipline, and despite plaudits and MVP awards have found themselves back on the bench. Amazingly, Cole contritely pointed out that he “would love to be involved again, and hopefully I will be given the chance to prove myself.”

In the Premiership his tactics cannot be faulted either, the level of control his side exerts of opposition teams has been exemplary, they conceded only 15 goals in the league last season, and have set the standards for organisation and defensive discipline.

Mourinho’s special-ness could also turn out to be his weakness. Having created an incredible excitement around the Barca fixture he failed to deliver. Needing two goals to stay in the competition, he picked Drogba who has struggled for goals since his arrival.

When he did adjust the side he replaced Cole with Huth, the center back proceeded to break up every Chelsea attack they tried to create. There were also still four defenders on the pitch and Wright-Philips remained on the bench, suggesting he does have some experiences to gain.

However, the Chelsea head coach has earned the right to make mistakes, and prepare for major competitions as he wishes. He recently negotiated a $37.5 million 5 year contract before bonuses, his only motives are likely to be excellence and when and where he decides to leave the game. Jose Mourinho- master of his own destiny; artistic indeed and a very special figure in Association Football.

Top of Page

England heads to World Cup with hope and consternation

SUNBURY ON THAMES, England (Wednesday, March 8, 2006) -- Well, England has the best economy in Europe, will host the Olympics in 2012 and is home to a football league with a global audience of over 600 million. Yet, when it comes to its World Cup campaigns, one is left with the distinct impression that the nation wants rather than needs.
In 2002, England lacked the necessary skill to break down a team with 10 men. In 1998, a failure to practice penalty kicks led to its elimination, having failed to adhere to the emphatic warning from world governing body FIFA that retaliation would be a straight red-card offense. Having reached the semifinals in 1990, the English did not even qualify for World Cup USA '94.

Yet, one cannot help but feel that despite their success elsewhere in culture and society, the English would happily forego these accomplishments to alleviate the pain and agony they have endured since their solitary success 40 years ago, just for a chance to taste again the ultimate glory that is winning the FIFA World Cup.

Thus, last Wednesday's 2-1 victory over Uruguay at Anfield in Liverpool marked an important point in the buildup to this summer as it was Sven-Goran Eriksson's last chance to assess players before choosing his World Cup squad for Germany.

The overall direction in which the team is headed is promising. In previous campaigns, England has been over-reliant on a particular player, or hard work and tenacity, to progress. This time around, the side has a more coherent plan and an innate confidence that it can take on any opposition and compete on equal terms. Furthermore, with the emergence of Joe Cole, England can threaten the opposition defense and score goals across the whole field.

Defensively, the side is very sound on paper. However, with Ashley Cole and Wayne Bridge returning from long-term injuries, and Rio Ferdinand still lacking concentration at vital moments, there are causes for concern, especially when England faces the stronger sides and the summer heat asks questions of player fitness.

Despite not having anything to prove, Uruguay found, as have other sides, that England can be opened up through midfield more easily than would be expected. Should Steven Gerrard and Frank Lampard be paired this summer, the lack of a player prepared to anchor the midfield and provide simple reception and passing options could prove problematic. England struggled in 2002 and 2004 through an inability to maintain possession; if it wants to compete in the later rounds, spending protracted periods of time defending cannot be entertained.

England is currently in a position to take on the world's best. This has not been this case since 1970 when Jeff Astle ostensible kicked England's chances a foot wide of an open goal against Brazil. If current manager Sven-Goran Eriksson is prepared to endure the media scrutiny and maintain a midfield of Cole, Michael Carrick, Lampard, and David Beckham, along with Michael Owen and Wayne Rooney, anything is possible.

Looking forward, there are still unerring questions that need to be answered. Firstly, why is a manager that has lost only two competitive fixtures since 2001allowed to be unseated from his job? Because of a newspaper setup? Yes, that's right a "newspaper" setup!

The English Football Association is currently looking for a new head coach with European and international experience. Eriksson not only ticks these boxes, but has two major tournaments under his belt. The future incumbent will not have the same experience in preparing a national side for international competition and will have to go through this process, which could undermine the next qualifying campaign.

Secondly, having been knocked out on penalty kicks in four of their last five major tournaments, does England have the confidence to take teams to penalties, should the opposition not want to play? When I recently asked Owen about this prospect, he laughed and avoided the question, suggesting perhaps that penalties conjured thoughts that they do not want to address.

Whatever argument is made for why England should win this summer's World Cup, Uruguay's presence last Wednesday provided a poignant reminder of the flaws in the hopes, dreams and aspirations reserved for the carriers of the Three Lions symbol.

England's reputation as a leading nation lies far beyond the realities of its success and a 1966 World Cup title. Uruguay has won two World Cups, while Brazil, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Italy, Argentina and Czech Republic have all competed in more major finals and\or won more trophies. England's quest in Germany will undoubtedly bring excruciating highs and lows; the nation that introduced to the world the beautiful game needs, no, prays the footballing gods will smile on them once again this year.

Top of Page

Top of Page

Florida || Georgia || North Carolina || South Carolina || Tennessee || Virginia

Southern Soccer Scene
PO Box 19445
Greensboro, NC  27419
Phone: (336) 292-7015
Fax: (336) 292-8135
Email: questions@southernsoccerscene.com